Monday, November 29, 2010
Article from the New York Times
Posting below as text
No Boo-boos or Cowlicks? Only in School Pictures
By SARAH MASLIN NIR
Published: November 19, 2010
Oliver Tracy showed up for his first-grade portrait with a crisp white shirt tucked into navy slacks, a striped tie slightly too long for his tiny frame, and not a lock of his sun-streaked blond hair out of place.
But just above Oliver’s right cheek was a scab; he had tumbled while playing tag. His father, Jahn Tracy, had e-mailed the school, the Bay Ridge Preparatory School in Brooklyn, to see if Oliver could take the photo on another day, after the cut healed.
Mr. Tracy need not have worried. When the big envelope of photos arrived, Oliver’s blemish was nowhere in sight.
The practice of altering photos, long a standard in the world of glossy magazines and fashion shoots, has trickled down to the wholesome domain of the school portrait. Parents who once had only to choose how many wallet-size and 5-by-7 copies they wanted are now being offered options like erasing scars, moles, acne and braces, whitening teeth or turning a bad hair day into a good one.
School photography companies around the country have begun to offer the service on a widespread basis over the past half-dozen years, in response to parents’ requests and to developments in technology that made fixing the haircut a 5-year-old gave herself, or popping a tooth into a jack-o’-lantern smile, easy and inexpensive. And every year, the companies say, the number of requests grows.
Joseph Sell, the New York area manager for Lifetouch, which says it takes about 30 million student photos a year, estimates that 10 percent of the company’s photos of elementary school pupils are now altered or, in the industry parlance, retouched.
Another company, Highpoint Pictures, estimated the proportion at 2 to 5 percent.
The numbers go up after the seventh grade, Mr. Sell said. By senior year, sometimes half of a class requests retouching, he said. “The media and magazines have exposed our marketplace to people that are well groomed and well cared for,” Mr. Sell said.
Lifetouch offers several levels of retouching, which can include a $6 “basic” treatment for small changes like removing the glare from eyeglasses; a $10-to-$20 “premier,” in which the teeth will be whitened or a cowlick tamed; and intricate, and more expensive, custom changes, like adding a tie or making short sleeves long.
What else can be tweaked? “There’s really not much limit,” Mr. Sell said.
Mindy Cimmino of Wrentham, Mass., who owns an event-planning company, said she was initially aghast when she noticed a small check box on her children’s photo order forms asking whether she wanted retouching.
Then, two years ago, her daughter Delaina scratched her face the day before her third-grade portrait. Delaina was despondent about going to school that day. So Ms. Cimmino checked the box.
“My rationale was, this is not something that is part of her face,” she said. “I didn’t feel like I was changing my child.”
(The father of Oliver, the Brooklyn first grader, gave a similar explanation for choosing retouching. “It’s not like I’m making him thinner,” Mr. Tracy said.)
But Ms. Cimmino said she was stunned to learn that a parent of a classmate of Delaina’s had asked for the congenital strawberry mark on the child’s face to be wiped away.
“That’s your kid,” Ms. Cimmino said in an interview. “You really need to think about the message it gives your kids about accepting themselves.”
Glossing over lasting disfigurements might not be a bad thing, said Dr. Bradley S. Peterson, chief of child and adolescent psychiatry at Columbia University and the New York State Psychiatric Institute.
“There are kids who have some substantial socially stigmatizing features that they want to tone down,” Dr. Peterson said. Doing so in a photograph can build confidence, he said.
But parents who choose to edit also run the risk of “potentially validating the concerns that it is not O.K. to be that way,” Dr. Peterson said.
“In some ways,” he said, “even though they’re trying to help the child’s confidence, it could inadvertently undermine it.”
Some companies have quietly offered retouching for many years.
At the time of its founding in 1946, Irvin Simon Photographers, which took Oliver’s photograph, employed artisans who could paint out pimples on negatives with special inks, or even out skin tone with a faint film of paint sprayed onto prints themselves. In those days, the services were available by special request, and the process was painstaking and expensive, said Steve Miller, a co-president.
Six years ago, like many of its competitors, Irvin Simon Photographers upgraded to digital technology. Now, for about $7, it routinely cleans up pimples, rubs out grass stains or neatens hair, among other touch-ups.
Sometimes the work is more substantial. Marty Hyman, who has been photographing schoolchildren in the New York area for more than 30 years, said that if “if a kid doesn’t look good in the class picture, we will, when necessary, take his head — if it looks better in another picture — and swap it in.”
At the Spence School in Manhattan, Jake Ahern, a science teacher who schedules class photos, said that three years ago the school began offering elementary school students who missed picture day the option of being digitally inserted into the class photo.
Some photo company executives admit to reservations about some of the services they have provided. Last year, Highpoint shortened a girl’s hair at a parent’s behest. The company’s owner, Jason Brand, said he felt that such requests went much further than minor editing.
“I think you want to look back on the way you were, and not the way you wanted to be,” Mr. Brand said. “It’s not an honest thing to reflect back on.”
Mr. Miller said that Irvin Simon would do whatever parents wanted, but he added, “We like to think that all the kids are cute already.”
Dr. Peterson said parents should keep in mind that “what supports healthy growth of the child and capacity to love themselves is parental idealization, that this child is perfect, and the apple of one’s eye.”
So if a parent has a school photo tinkered with, Dr. Peterson said, “it can inadvertently send a message that ‘I perceive you as less than perfect and not ideal.’ ”
When it was his turn for a portrait in the gym at Bay Ridge Prep, Michael Terzuoli, a second grader, straightened his clip-on tie and brushed blond bangs out of his eyes, revealing a nickel-size birthmark on his forehead. He smiled for the picture, then ran off to play.
His mother, Tatiana, said she would let Michael decide if he wanted the mark edited out.
Asked what he would do if he saw his picture without his distinctive birthmark, Michael said, “I’d rip it up.”
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Thoughtful Piece on the Value of School Pictures
Below is a really thoughtful piece from a Mom in Maryland, Kym Byrnes, who epitomizes our customers. She's comfortable with digital, values the immediacy of the digital pictures she takes, and yet, sees the past the easy assertions -- School pictures are too expensive! -- to a more evenhanded opinion.
In the excerpts below, she addresses key themes such as:
Value and customer service...
"A friend of mine suggested that school pictures are a racket. She has three children in elementary school and was frustrated that the school photographers don't give a multiple child discount. She laughed that she doesn't even really want the school pictures, but feels obliged to take them."
The importance of choice, and control over purchasing decisions
"Pictures do come in handy to give grandparents and put in gifts... But those picture packages from school are not cheap, and in some cases I've been forced to make a decision without even seeing them! How do I know if I want one 8-by-10 or 36 wallet size photos if I don't even know if I will like the photo? "
The relevance of printed pictures to today's mom
"My sister has given me my nephew's school and sports photos over the years and, to be honest, I never really know what to do with them."
The effect of peer pressure and obligation
"Maybe, like my friend, I feel obligation to purchase class and sports photos because I don't want my kids to feel left out when their friends turn in their orders and get those envelopes to bring home. "
The appeal of non-photographic items
"I've never been interested in trinket items -- keychains and mugs and trading cards and other things that, to me, resemble promotional items businesses hand out at marketing events."
In am age where customers can just blast a company and bad-mouth a product through a quick Facebook post, Ms. Byrnes instead gives our industry a thoughtful critique. One we need to listen to and learn from.
Friday, October 15, 2010
School Picture Value Being Recognized
Here's the link.
Monday, October 11, 2010
A Mom Sees the Value of School Pics
Here's an example of a mom who recognized the value of the school pictures she received. She saw, and wrote about, how her kids were taken care of, assisted with grooming, and "look better in their photos than they did when they left the house."
Here's the link to her blog.
Now let's think about this... are we helping all of our customers look better than they did when they left the house?
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Another Mom Clicks the Shutter on Her Own School Pictures
http://thecheeryos.blogspot.com/2010/09/homemade-school-pictures.html
Saturday, October 2, 2010
How Do We Communicate the Value of School Pictures?
1.) We (as photography companies) fail to communicate the value our service provides. We don't effectively help our customers understand the value of the school picture. The convenience of having a professional portrait made on-location during the school day, the time savings of not having to schedule an appointment at Wal-Mart or wherever to have a picture made, the contributions we make back to their school, the class pictures we provide as part of a package, the support we give to yearbook staffs, the online child safety programs, and on and on.
2.) As a result of the first point, Mom - our customer - does not see any reason to pay $40.00 for something she can get for less that half at Target. This is echoed over and over again in the blog and Facebook posts of moms who have either stopped purchasing school pictures altogether or feel outraged over the price : quality ratio we are providing.
These are not photography or technology problems. They're worse. They're customer perception problems. Our question to you is this:
What ways does your studio communicate the value of your pictures?
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Five Part Series in Columbus Dispatch
http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/special_reports/stories/2010/youth_sports/index.html
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Matt Keenan commentary: Narcissistic kids don’t need a photo shoot - KansasCity.com
Matt Keenan commentary: Narcissistic kids don’t need a photo shoot - KansasCity.com
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Photography Students Produce Work Commenting on the Controversy Surrounding the Photography of Children

Picked this up off Google today from the British Journal of Photography. Fascinating and witty commentary on how the attitudes toward adults photographing kids has changed over the years. Kudos to photography students, Anna Brooks and Samantha Harvey for seeing things in a way no one else has, and creating such eloquent and striking images.
Check out the article.
Monday, June 28, 2010
School Pictures Can Be Funny
Ellen Degeneres Twitter
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Are Youth Sports Pictures a Waste of Time?
And what's really interesting here is this: Ms. Lefferts has come up with a solution to her problem. She figures the parents can just do it themselves. And frankly, especially if what she is receiving is as mediocre as she says, she probably can.
And that's our challenge. What are we doing that Ms. Leffert's cannot? How hard are we working to capture the essence -- or at least a glimpse -- of each child we photograph? How effectively are we expressing the value of the service we provide to both her family and the league?
I've copied the entire text of Ms. Leffert's article below.
From the Maplewood Patch, Maplewood, New Jersey.
By Brooke Lefferts.
I spent 30 chaotic minutes this week in the South Orange Middle School gym as my six-year-old had pictures taken for his baseball team. If you have ever been to a children's sports photography shoot, you know that they are as organized as a two-year-old's finger paint canvas. No one knows where to go—this one lost his hat—that one has only one sock—and only a third of the parents there have filled out their forms.
So, as I stood in line with the other frustrated adults, dripping with whiny, hungry children (it's usually called right in the middle of dinner time), I wondered why I bothered at all. I take pretty good pictures myself. I attend practically every game and take action shots of my kids swinging a bat, making a catch, or getting dirty in the dugout. My prints are a hundred times more captivating than a staged headshot with a fake background.
And how hard is it to gather the team together following a game to get a group shot? (OK, maybe it is a bit like wrangling sheep but you get the picture!)
Yet every year, I fork over at least $17 for four mediocre pictures of my kid in uniform. I have three kids who all play soccer, and two who play baseball, so that's five sets of unnecessary phony flashes at a minimum of $85—in just this year alone.
Why do we do it? It certainly isn't to have a professional shot of my kids to remember what they looked like at every adorable and awkward stage of development. That's what school pictures are for. Those cheesy mugs are a rite of passage. You want to be able to look back at yourself and remember who was in your class each year, and, of course, what trendy outfit you wore.
I still have my baby book filled with wallet-sized shots of me all dressed up, sporting a gap-toothed grin or poofy hairdo. (Oh, if you could only see the one from second grade with my large, pointy-collared plaid dress. Or later in a whale turtleneck and headband. Classic.)
In the past, we have purchased the sports packages so we could send the prints and trading cards to our out-of-town relatives. But when it's so much easier and more efficient to email pictures and/or share them on a photo site, snail mail seems like a colossal misuse of time.
So if taking the sports pix are not for nostalgic or family reasons, aren't they just another example of needless waste?
Do we really need another set of stilted portraits sitting in our drawers when we have better shots of sliding into third, or faces dripping with chocolate ice cream after the game? Those are the ones that capture the moment and make you smile.
We are down to the minimum—Package E—these days and we've learned to avoid the trading cards, mouse pads, and bobble heads. I would skip it altogether but my husband, who usually coaches, needs to be there to pose, so we often wind up getting sucked into a package through a combination of peer pressure and guilt.
We happily ordered the most decadent packages for our oldest son, won over by the newness and the sight of him in that adorable outfit and his miniature cleats. But now the excitement has worn off and the idea seems like a silly extravagance.
Maybe every team can start a sharing website at the beginning of the season. I would volunteer to take a team picture and email it to all the parents on the team. If every team could find one volunteer to do the same, we could use all that extra money towards something more valuable to the sport like fixing the fields, improving equipment, or contributing to a fund that covers the seasonal costs for those in the community who can't afford it.
Call me negative, but I think there are better ways to spend our money and time. So, we are going to shake things up like a Polaroid picture and just say no to sportography—next year.
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Facebook Usage Tracked and Quantified
Check it out.
2007 - Ages 25-54 represent 17% of 20 million users.
2008 - Ages 25-54 represent 28% of 26 million users.
2009 - Ages 25-54 represent 42% of 42 million users.
2010 - Ages 25-54 represent 55% of 103 million users.
I don't know if anyone in our industry has exactly figured out how to create value for school picture consumers through Facebook or if it can even be done. But I'll bet the one who gets it right will win big.
What do you think? What strategies are you trying in your business?
JA
Saturday, April 17, 2010
Fast Ways to Target the Right Schools
That isn't so easy when taking your show on the road and selling in an area where you are not as familiar. Trying to filter the hundreds (or thousands) of schools down to the ones that make the most sense for your business can be a very daunting and expensive prospect.
Fortunately, there are some free web tools that can make the job a lot easier. These web sites all contain useful demographic data that will help school photographers find the right schools for their business.
Public School Review
Private School Review
Great Schools
National Center for Education Statistics
Happy hunting!
Thursday, April 15, 2010
More Moms Lash Out at Speculation School Photography
Monday, April 12, 2010
Can't We Be Better Than This?
Link to article, excerpted below.
Courtesy of the Columbia Daily Tribune, by Doug Pugh.
The only exceptions were the school pictures I was required to sit for each year from kindergarten through ninth grade. One day each year, we were all forced to stand in line and then sit in front of a pale brown screen as an old man blurted out annoying jokes before blinding us with a violent flash of light. Our parents were then encouraged to purchase, at varying prices, assorted packages of the resulting photograph, which were handed out to the class amid great clamor and eagerness several weeks later. While all of the other kids ripped into gigantic envelopes filled with hundreds of pictures of every shape and size imaginable, I was always left holding a miserable strip of paper containing three tiny photos roughly the size of sugar packets.
In hindsight, this was one of the few instances of my mother’s vehement frugality being entirely well-founded. For my birthday last year, she presented me with a framed collage of every single one of my old school pictures, which had somehow miraculously survived her voracious desire to throw things away over the years. When I was in elementary school, I was required to dress myself and comb my own hair every morning. Also, it appears I was not allowed to eat or sleep for months on end. The result was that none of my school pictures is identifiable in any way from any of the others, but instead a sad series of identical poses: my head tilted nearly sideways, a glum frown traversing my gaunt face, one eye open and one eye shut, tufts of hair and cowlicks shooting out in every direction.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
School Picture Article Sparks Debate in Atlanta Journal - Constitution
The comments are unbelievably valuable. In less than 24 hours the article generated 151 of them. Clearly, the author has touched a nerve. There seem to be three themes that emerge:
1.) Speculation photography is widely disliked by consumers. Commenters pointed out that they feel pressure, that they do not like the waste, and that it feels like an old and outdated way to do business.
2.) The consumer has little or no knowledge that retail prices are driven by the amount of commission given back to schools, or that there is even a fundraising component to school photography at all.
3.) Many consumers have little or no issue with making copies of the prints they are presented with on home scanners and then using them as they see fit.
Sometimes we, as an industry, need a wake up call. For speculation programs, maybe this is it.
The article is excerpted below, and linked to in its entirety below.
In the article below from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution the author, Theresa Walsh Giarrusso asks some pointed questions within the context of her own experience as a mother with school pictures.
Dare to Send Back your Child's School Photo?
6:36 am March 30, 2010, by Theresa Walsh Giarrusso
The photography companies that take the school pictures have come up with the greatest marketing ploy ever to make you buy those photos. They send home the entire package, including plastic-coated key-ring photos, without you even ordering them.
No mother worth her salt is going to tell her child that he or she must return their own photo to school!
Or would she?
I told Walsh this morning that his spring photo wasn’t fantastic. I told him his hair needed to be cut and it was all in his eyes.
I didn’t say this to him, but he also has in the photo one big-boy front tooth next to a baby front tooth that looks a little crazy. His smile was forced and fake. Plus he was wearing a Halloween shirt in February.
I recognize that all of this is my own fault, except for the tooth and smile parts, because I didn’t pay attention to the spring photo date, but that doesn’t mean I have to pay $42 for five pages of bad photos. (I have plenty of beautiful photos of my son that we take at home.)
He put on fake tears at the breakfast table and told me I hurt his feelings.
I bought one page of the photos for $12 and sent the rest back.
If you don’t send them back in time you owe the full price for all five sheets of photos even though you didn’t ask for them.
Friday, March 26, 2010
My Secret Selling Sauce
It's a 35 page integrity selling pocket guide that rides in my briefcase on every sales call...it's torn at the edges and falling apart at the seems as it has been removed from my briefcase before I call on every new prospect. there is not a secret sauce or magic potion...it's just integrity.
A Statement of Integrity Selling Values and Ethics:
1. Selling is an exchange of value.
2. Selling isn't something you do to someone it's something you do for and with someone.
3. Understanding people's wants or needs must always precede any attempt to sell.
4. Develop trust and rapport before any selling activity begins.
5. Selling techniques give way to selling principles.
6. Integrity and high ethics are accepted as the basis for long-term selling success.
7. A salesperson's ethics and values contribute more to sales success than do the techniques or strategies.
8. Selling pressure is never exerted by the salesperson. It's exerted only by the prospect when they perceive they want or need the item being sold.
9. Negotiation is never manipulation. It's always a strategy to work out problems...when prospects want to work out the problems.
10. Closing isn't just a victory for the salesperson. It's a victory for both the salesperson and the customer.
A statement of integrity value and ethics by: Ron Willingham for Integrity Training Systems.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
TSS Signs Nationwide Deal with USA Football -- What's it Mean to Independent Sports Photgraphers?
What are the advantages of a company like TSS?
Why would a league choose them over a local independent?
What should labs be doing to make their independent photographers competitive with TSS?
How much do independents even pay attention to groups like TSS, GPA, and others?
Would love to see your comments below.
JA
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Youth Sports Photographers Talk About Changing Business
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Two in Two Days!
What can we do better on picture day and afterward. I get it -- we're hardly creating art here and we're not charging for art either -- but some of this stuff is just dumb. We can do better, don't you think?
Reprinted below...
Photos of my son Ack are priceless
-
Courtesy photo
Little Jack’s spring portrait last year came back with an expression that was something between come-hither and creepy.
"Shortening?" his mom says, handing him the tub. "Honestly, Calvin, I wish you'd remember these things the night before. Now hurry up and get ready."
Minutes later Calvin hands the shortening back to his mother, who leaps up, horrified. Her son's hair is slicked back into a hideous, gravity-defying spiral updo.
"Aw c'mon, Mom!" Calvin pleads. "It's class picture day!"
My 9-year-old hasn't tried Crisco, but his school pictures are priceless nonetheless. With Jack, it's all about the facial expression.
Last year's spring portrait may have set the standard. His expression was something between come-hither and creepy, a crooked half-smile that channeled Dennis Hopper. His hair, an overgrown bowl cut swept to one side by some well- meaning photo assistant, looked dirty and windblown. His jeans were at least three inches too short.
But the best part of the portrait was a bubble-letter word superimposed on the background. Jack's head was positioned precisely in front of the first letter of his name, resulting in a shocking but appropriate "ACK."
Which is exactly what I said when I saw the photo.
My daughter met me outside school that day, both proof packets in her hand.
"This," she said, handing me her portraits, "is what a good child does on Picture Day." Hannah's smile was serene, elegant, her black turtleneck smooth and lint-free.
"And this," she said, offering her brother's proofs, "is Jack."
Indeed it was. Ack.
By now I'm used to it. Jack's first school picture, a photo of his Montessori preschool class, featured my son front and center, his face squinched into a dreadful grimace.
His teacher met me at the door that day. "I'm so sorry," she whispered, handing over the envelope as if conducting a drug deal. "I guess the photographer didn't catch that."
We bought the photos anyway. We always do. I just wrote a check for this year's portraits, in which Jack sports a leather-and-arrowhead necklace he crafted at Cub Scouts. He snuck it to school to accessorize his understated gray sweater.
Like Calvin and Hobbes, I appreciate the truth and beauty of these pictures, which capture Jack's spirit, rough edges and humor.
"Hee hee hee! Look at this one! What an expression!" Hobbes giggles in one comic strip. "Hoo hoo hoo!"
"Yeah," Calvin says. "See how I got my one eye to roll back?"
That's my boy.
Reach Suzanne Perez Tobias at 316-268-6567 or stobias@wichitaeagle.com.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Article from the New York Times
Posting below as text.
The Man Who Clicks With 7-Year-Olds
By JOANNE KAUFMAN
Published: March 3, 2010
THE name Marty Hyman may mean nothing to you. But if you, your children or grandchildren have gone to private schools in and around Manhattan over the last 30 years, chances are you’ve either smiled for Mr. Hyman or written him a check.
That’s because with an account list of 500 — including Dalton, Chapin, Hewitt, Riverdale, St. David’s, Grace Church and the 92nd Street Y, as well as public schools and camps in the metropolitan area — Mr. Hyman, 67, is practically the Irving Penn of the preschool and preteen set.
A few Fridays ago, there he was at the Windmill Montessori School in Brooklyn, taking candid pictures. Like an eager politician on a campaign swing, Mr. Hyman, known in certain circles as the picture man, made his way through Windmill’s two buildings seeking not votes, but smiles.
“I just saw you kids downstairs — you were eating yogurt,” he said, announcing himself to a group of 7- and 8-year-olds.
“We were doing yoga, not eating yogurt,” corrected Brendan, who laughed obligingly as Mr. Hyman peered through the viewfinder of his Canon digital SLR and snapped away.
“What a face — look at that face,” Mr. Hyman said, taking his grin-winning approach to 8-year-old Brian.
With his graying beard and bad back — a hazard of the profession — Mr. Hyman is something of a legend among school administrators. He was greeted by Liza Herzberg, Windmill’s director, like a favorite family member. But it might be more accurate to think of Mr. Hyman and others in his business as members of an endangered species.
About 5 to 10 years ago, class photos and individual student portraits were reflexive purchases for parents. Those 4-by-6 and 8-by-10 prints were the visual equivalents of the notches made on door frames to show how much Junior had grown since last year. Now, more parents are snapping their own digital pictures and declining the products of the pros. It’s a situation akin to the disappearance of the formal engagement and wedding portraits, courtesy of Bachrach, that were once a staple of newspaper society pages.
Mr. Hyman, who grew up in Brooklyn, began taking pictures as a teenager when his uncle gave him an old Voigtländer. Later on, after teaching junior high school for a decade, he wearied of the bureaucracy and turned his summer job photographing children at a Westchester day camp into a full-time job.
He has a couple of plush toys and shticks that have served him well. Way back when “Sesame Street” became popular, he and the 10 photographers on his staff started carrying around Cookie Monster dolls, then added a purple dinosaur when Barney was in its ascendancy. Those props, periodically replaced, still work well. “The character’s name should have an ‘e’ sound so the kids go into a smile when they say it,” Mr. Hyman said.
He also engages the children by insisting he can guess a name with just the clue of a first initial.
“You do that for a few minutes, and they’re your friends,” he said. “Of course, these days everyone is called Madison.”
The highest profit per shutter click in the school photography business is the high school senior picture, “but we just never got into it,” Mr. Hyman said.
“You don’t have to be a genius to be able to take a 16-year-old girl who’s eager to have her picture taken and tell her how to sit, tip her head a certain way and give a nice little smile,” he continued. “But when you got a 2 1/2-year-old, a 5-year-old, it’s a whole other set of skills. If you can do young kids, you can do any kids.”
Mr. Hyman’s main rival is Irvin Simon Photography, which is based in Elmont, N.Y., and has 1,000 accounts, according to Steve Miller, 39, whose father bought the company in 1980. These include New York Public Schools 3, 6, 87, 89, 158 and 234 as well as many summer camps, Mr. Miller said.
Highpoint Pictures, another competitor, has a broader geographic reach — its clients include the upper division of Horace Mann and independent schools as far away as Noble and Greenough in Dedham, Mass. Then, of course, there are those other pesky competitors: shutterbug parents.
“They take pictures of their kids on their camera phones,” Mr. Hyman said. “They take them on their digital cameras and print them on their printers or get them from Costco for 13 cents a copy. They’re not good, but they’re good enough. I lost at least one account at a school that farmed out the photography to a mother in the PTA.”
The statistics back him up. According to the Photo Marketing Association, 20.8 percent of all American households bought K-11 school portraits in 2008, the most recent year for which data is available, spending an estimated $920 million. In 2007, it was more than a quarter of households spending $1.127 billion.
To hold on to certain clients, Mr. Hyman said, he has sometimes been compelled to provide free photo stickers for school ID cards and free head-shot images for school databases. At least once — at a parent’s request — he Photoshopped an absent child into the class picture.
“Other photographers have solicited our business, but I see no need to switch,” said Jan Barnett, an administrator at the Dalton School. “The children love him, the teachers love working with him, the product is beautiful. Rarely is there a blink in the pictures.”
Ms. Herzberg of Windmill Montessori agreed. “Marty takes amazing pictures,” she said. “You can tell who the kids are and what they’re about from the images.”
At Windmill Montessori, Mr. Hyman headed into a class where 4-year-old Elliot was busily cutting construction paper. “What are you making, cutie pie?” he asked as he snapped off a few shots and then worked the room. “Look at these great puppets!” he said with enthusiasm, adding, “Don’t look at the camera, just keep doing your work.”
Sophia, who is 4, posed by the pink cage holding the class hamster, Bella. “The hamster goes up and down every day,” she earnestly informed Mr. Hyman.
Mr. Hyman’s definition of candid photography was sometimes a bit fluid. “Sit down there and grab a book and make believe you’re reading,” he told Hannah, a 4-year-old with pigtails, who obediently took a book from a shelf and sat on a small rug. “Where’s your smile?” he asked teasingly. “Where’s that smile?”
“You’re so silly,” Hannah said.
He moved on to his last stop of the morning, Stepping Stones, a room of 2- and 3-year-olds.
“Who’s that guy?” Mr. Hyman asked 2 1/2-year-old Ryan, showing the boy an image of himself in the viewfinder.
Then: “I’ve got an idea,” he said. ”When I count to three, I want you all to say ‘Dinosaur!’ ”
Mr. Hyman is selling tradition and continuity in the form of a familiar tableau: three rows of children with gap-toothed frozen grins, teachers smiling in the back row. It’s a commodity that fluctuates in value. These days for Mr. Hyman, a respectable sale is $45 to $50.
“When kids are little, they’re the cutest things,” he said. “When they’ve been driving you crazy for a few years, you’re not going to do the $49.95 package. You buy the class picture for $10 and say ‘Get away from me.’ ”